Toronto skyline at dusk representing large Ontario rental and development financing decisions.

Ontario rental financing comparison

MLI Select vs ACLP vs Conventional vs Bridge/Private

These routes solve different problems. Compare them by project stage, source of funds, underwriting burden, timing, ongoing commitments, and exit—not by a single leverage or rate headline.

Reviewed August 11, 202613 minute read

01Direct loan, insured loan, and lender-defined products kept distinct

02Current CMHC ceilings dated August 11, 2026

03Best-fit and poor-fit conditions stated plainly

Decision map

Four routes, four different jobs

Program facts were checked against CMHC pages on August 11, 2026. Conventional and bridge/private terms are lender-specific and intentionally have no universal rate, leverage, amortization, or approval claims here.

Four routes, four different jobs
RouteWhat it isOften considered whenCentral trade-off
MLI SelectCMHC mortgage loan insurance through an approved lenderAn eligible 5+ unit new or existing rental can support documented social or environmental commitmentsPotential insurance flexibilities versus commitments, premium, documentation, and timing
ACLPDirect CMHC construction-to-stabilization loan with integrated mortgage insuranceAn eligible new rental or conversion meets supply, affordability, viability, and program requirementsLow-cost long-duration construction capital versus a selective, documentation-heavy program process
ConventionalA bank, credit union, or institutional lender’s own balance-sheet loanThe property and borrower fit lender policy without a federal programPotentially simpler structure versus lender-specific leverage, amortization, recourse, and pricing
Bridge/privateShort-term transitional capital from institutional, MIC, or private sourcesTiming or property conditions block permanent financing today and a credible fix existsSpeed and flexibility versus higher cost, shorter term, and maturity/extension risk

01

The most important distinction: program, insurance, or lender product

ACLP is a direct CMHC loan program. MLI Select is CMHC mortgage loan insurance arranged through an approved lender. Conventional and bridge/private loans are lender products whose terms depend on the lender and file. Calling all four “CMHC options” or comparing only their quoted rates obscures who supplies the money and what has to happen before funding.

A route can also change during the project. A borrower may use conventional or private acquisition debt, ACLP or another facility for construction, and MLI Select or conventional debt at stabilization. The transitions need to be designed as one capital plan.

Sources: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation; Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

02

MLI Select: insured flexibility tied to measurable commitments

MLI Select applies to eligible new and existing multi-unit projects and uses points for affordability, energy efficiency, and accessibility. As of this review, eligible projects generally require at least five units, and non-residential space must remain within CMHC’s stated limits.

CMHC’s current public table shows new-construction flexibilities beginning at 50 points with up to 95% loan-to-cost, minimum 1.10 debt coverage for standard rental, and up to 40-year amortization. At higher point levels, amortization may extend to 45 or 50 years and limited-recourse treatment may become available. For existing properties, the table shows up to 85% loan-to-value at 50 points, up to 95% at 70 points, and amortization increasing by points to as much as 50 years.

These are ceilings and flexibilities, not automatic proceeds. The approved lender and CMHC still assess valuation, income, borrower, property, documentation, and the claimed commitments. Affordability commitments generally last at least 10 years; a 20-year commitment currently earns additional points.

Current-rule note: CMHC also publishes annual rules for certain affordability rent increases. For any live file, verify the current year’s program page and compliance documents rather than copying an older model.

Source: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

03

ACLP: construction through stabilized operations

The Apartment Construction Loan Program provides direct low-cost financing for eligible rental construction and certain conversions. CMHC states that the program is open for applications and that standard-rental loans begin at $1 million for projects with at least five rental units.

Current public features include a fixed rate locked at first advance, potential amortization up to 50 years, up to 100% loan-to-cost for residential space and 75% for non-residential space depending on application strength, interest-only treatment through construction and stabilization mechanics, monthly construction draws, and integrated CMHC mortgage insurance.

Eligibility also includes supply, residential-use, viability, documentation, and affordability requirements. CMHC currently requires the standard-rental affordability commitment for at least 10 years. Projects are prioritized, then proceed through conditional approval, external underwriting, term sheet, loan agreement, and advances. At the end of the term, the borrower must arrange take-out with a CMHC-approved lender.

Source: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

04

Conventional: lender policy without a social-outcome program

Conventional financing can fund acquisition, construction, or permanent debt when a bank, credit union, or institutional lender is satisfied with the borrower, property, cash flow, value, equity, recourse, and timing. There is no single conventional term sheet for the Ontario market.

It may be a better fit when the requested leverage is moderate, the property is already stable, program timing is too long, or the borrower does not want to undertake program commitments. It may be a poor fit when the asset is transitional, the requested proceeds exceed lender policy, construction risk is unresolved, or recognized NOI is not yet established.

Compare debt coverage, amortization, term, recourse, prepayment, annual review, reserves, security, reporting, and refinance flexibility. A faster approval is not the same as an unconditional or certain closing.

Source: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

05

Bridge/private: buy time only when the fix is measurable

Bridge capital is useful when the property or timing does not fit permanent financing today—for example, a rapid acquisition, renovation, vacancy, lease-up, incomplete records, or an expiring loan. The lender may be a bank, debt fund, mortgage investment corporation, company, or individual; “bridge” describes the job, not one standardized product.

FSRA’s Ontario consumer guidance says alternative/private mortgages are generally short-term, can carry higher interest and fees, and are often interest-only. It emphasizes full cost disclosure and a realistic exit strategy. Sophisticated commercial borrowers should apply the same discipline: model the maturity balance, extension terms, default remedies, and permanent-lender timeline before closing.

Bridge/private is usually a poor fit when the exit depends only on appreciation, unspecified refinancing, perfect future occupancy, or new equity that has not been committed.

Source: Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario

06

A borrower’s route test

Answer these questions before requesting quotes. They reveal which route is structurally plausible and which is only attractive in a headline comparison.

  • Is the request for acquisition, construction, stabilization, or permanent debt?
  • Is the property already producing lender-recognizable stabilized NOI?
  • Can the borrower document and maintain affordability, energy, or accessibility commitments?
  • Does the closing date allow program application, underwriting, legal, and funding?
  • How much recourse, reporting, reserve control, and prepayment restriction is acceptable?
  • What is the all-in cost through the expected hold period, including premiums and fees?
  • What happens if costs rise, lease-up slows, or permanent proceeds fall?

07

Compare offers on one page

Build a common comparison using the same cost budget, NOI, valuation, closing date, and downside assumptions. Do not let each quote use a different version of the project.

Minimum fields for an apples-to-apples comparison
EconomicsExecutionLong-term obligations
Gross and net proceedsApproval and funding pathAffordability or other commitments
Rate basis and interest reserveRequired reports and third partiesRecourse and guarantees
Insurance premium and lender feesDraw and equity mechanicsOngoing reporting and reserves
Amortization and paymentsConditions and timing riskPrepayment, refinance, and sale flexibility
Extension and default costsFallback if the target close slipsMaturity and take-out requirements

Before you commit

Risks to put in writing

  1. 01A program ceiling can be materially higher than the proceeds supported by income, value, costs, or borrower strength.
  2. 02A lower nominal rate can be outweighed by premium, fees, timing, commitments, or an incompatible draw structure.
  3. 03Program requirements and annual compliance rules can change after an old model or article was prepared.
  4. 04Bridge debt can consume equity through interest, fees, extension costs, and a delayed take-out.
  5. 05No comparison replaces lender, CMHC, legal, tax, appraisal, environmental, and technical review of the actual file.

Package checklist

Documents that move the review

  • Project stage, use, unit count, and non-residential area
  • Sources and uses, capital budget, schedule, and current debt
  • Rent roll, operating history, pro forma, and appraisal if available
  • Affordability, energy, accessibility, and program-workbook materials
  • Borrower net worth, liquidity, experience, ownership, and guarantees
  • Target closing date and a written primary and fallback exit

Borrower questions

Common questions, direct answers

Is MLI Select a direct CMHC loan?+

No. It is CMHC mortgage loan insurance arranged through an approved lender. ACLP is the direct CMHC construction-to-stabilization loan program discussed in this guide.

Does ACLP eliminate the need for take-out financing?+

No. CMHC’s current standard-rental program page says the borrower must arrange take-out with a CMHC-approved lender at the end of the term.

Is conventional always faster than insured financing?+

Not necessarily. Timing depends on lender capacity, file completeness, appraisal and reports, approvals, legal work, and the transaction. Confirm a real critical path for each option.

Can private financing be the permanent plan?+

Private terms vary, but FSRA characterizes alternative/private mortgages as generally short-term and emphasizes a realistic exit. A borrower considering a long hold should compare the full renewal, cost, and enforcement risk carefully.

Which route has the lowest rate?+

There is no responsible universal answer. Rates are live, file-specific, and only one part of cost. Compare net proceeds, premiums, fees, amortization, timing, recourse, commitments, and downside execution.

Provided by Garrison Capital Corp., operating as Open Financial. This guide is general information, not a commitment to lend, approve, insure, or fund a mortgage. This page is not legal, accounting, tax, appraisal, engineering, environmental, or investment advice.

Compare routes for my file